This block felt trickier than others, mostly due to random errors that I
wasn't able to find a cause for. Tests that I'm uncertain about are:
-first_regression_test
-future_timeout_test
-future_or_bad_type_test/implements
These all have status entries to prevent failures, but I think these
tests need another set of eyes.
BUG=
R=rnystrom@google.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2999943002 .
A recent VM change is triggering an assertion in the VM's snapshot
writer in the ahead-of-time compiler. Since things seem to be
otherwise working, I've filed an issue and disabled the test for now.
BUG=
R=sortie@google.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2957613002 .
It can compile and run tests on Chrome. There are a lot of failing tests
that I (or the team) will need to triage, but I think at least basic
tests are working as expected.
There is code that could be cleaned up to more neatly factor how dart2js
and dartdevc are handled now that there are two separate compilers to
JS. There's also some redundant code between the path for testing
compile errors (enqueueStandardTest()) and the path for running a test
in the browser.
R=whesse@google.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2947473002 .
Before this, if a generic class was instantiated with only dynamic,
TypeArgument::null would be used as the type argument, ignoring
types from the super.
Now it only returns TypeArguments::null if the class directly gives all
type arguments (and they are all dynamic).
Fixes#29537
BUG=
R=kmillikin@google.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2941983002 .
This is a pretty massive change but my hope is it will make
test.dart easier to maintain going forward. Instead of
passing around a stringly-typed Map<String, dynamic> all
throughout the program, we parse the options and then create
a Configuration object that has typed getters for all of the
various bits of configuration data.
This is a little tedious because it means declaring a new
option requires also declaring a corresponding field in the
Configuration class and passing it through the constructor.
I think it's worth it.
Also, enum-like configuration properties like architecture
and runtime now have their own classes as well. Moved a
bunch of stuff from TestUtil into those classes now that
there is an object to hang those methods off of.
In the process, I found a few typos in string literals where
the code wasn't correctly looking up a configuration
property.
Added more sanity checking and validation to status file
parsing. You will get an error at parse time if you try to
refer to a variable that isn't in the whitelist of known
variables. Also, you'll get an error if you try to compare
a variable to a value that it isn't expected to have.
Many other small-scale cleanups.
Aside from the status file validation, this should behave
mostly the same as current test.dart except that tests
may be enqueued in a slightly different order. The
rewritten code for expanding configurations iterates
through the architecture, runtime, etc. options in a
slightly different order.
R=whesse@google.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2901923003 .
Before: Canonical names contained pointers to the corresponding Kernel
tree which assumed that the whole tree was in memory whenever the
canonical names were.
Now: Canonical names do not contain these pointers. They were only
really used to perform name-based lookup in the VM's heap so the
canonical name itself is enough.
If we later find that we need to get from a canonical name to its
Kernel tree we can add an offset in the binary (for instance) to the
canonical name or in a separate mapping on the side.
BUG=
R=asgerf@google.com, jensj@google.com, vegorov@google.com
Committed: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/commit/ed77783cd32d55fdad61bf9bc749030847ba9384
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2781893004 .
Ben Konyi