Tentative commit by Ed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -110,7 +110,10 @@ void handler_who_has(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef DEPRECATED /* was for BAC_ROUTING - delete in 2/2012 if still unused */
|
||||
#ifdef BAC_ROUTING /* was for BAC_ROUTING - delete in 2/2012 if still unused */
|
||||
/* EKH: I restored this to BAC_ROUTING (from DEPRECATED) because I found that the server demo with the built-in
|
||||
virtual Router did not insert the SADRs of the virtual devices on the virtual network without it */
|
||||
|
||||
/** Handler for Who-Has requests in the virtual routing setup,
|
||||
* with broadcast I-Have response.
|
||||
* Will respond if the device Object ID matches, and we have
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +113,11 @@ void handler_who_is_unicast(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef DEPRECATED /* was for BAC_ROUTING - delete in 2/2012 if still unused */
|
||||
#ifdef BAC_ROUTING /* was for BAC_ROUTING - delete in 2/2012 if still unused */
|
||||
/* EKH: I restored this to BAC_ROUTING (from DEPRECATED) because I found that the server demo with the built-in
|
||||
virtual Router did not insert the SADRs of the virtual devices on the virtual network without it */
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/** Local function to check Who-Is requests against our Device IDs.
|
||||
* Will check the gateway (root Device) and all virtual routed
|
||||
* Devices against the range and respond for each that matches.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user