Files
sdk/pkg
asiva f81a402aa1 "[SDK/VM] - Rename dart_precompiled_runtime to dartaotruntime, ensures we have a uniform name for the executable between the build directories and the SDK directory"
Fixed golem breakage by temporarily copying dartaotruntime to dart_precompiled_runtime

This reverts commit 75e6a748f7.

TEST=ci

Original change's description:
> Revert "[SDK/VM] - Rename dart_precompiled_runtime to dartaotruntime, ensures we have a uniform name for the executable between the build directories and the SDK directory"
>
> This reverts commit 1b331d05c2.
>
> Reason for revert: golem builds are failing
>
> Original change's description:
> > [SDK/VM] - Rename dart_precompiled_runtime to dartaotruntime, ensures we have a uniform name for the executable between the build directories and the SDK directory
> >
> > TEST=ci
> >

Change-Id: Id0f383eabb496c06c0acebc639c8e3b056ba82d0
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/393781
Commit-Queue: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com>
2024-11-06 03:10:31 +00:00
..

Package validation

The packages in pkg/ are automatically validated on the LUCI CI bots. The validation is largely done by the tools/package_deps package; it can be tested locally via:

dart tools/package_deps/bin/package_deps.dart

Packages which are published

There are several packages developed in pkg/ which are published to pub. Validation of these packages is particularly important because the pub tools are not used for these packages during development; we get our dependency versions from the DEPS file. It's very easy for the dependencies specified in a package's pubspec file to get out of date wrt the packages and versions actually used.

In order to better ensure we're publishing correct packages, we validate some properties of the pubspec files on our CI system. These validations include:

  • that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
  • that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
  • that we don't use relative path deps to pkg/ or third_party/ packages

Packages which are not published

For packages in pkg/ which we do not intend to be published, we put the following comment in the pubspec.yaml file:

# This package is not intended for consumption on pub.dev. DO NOT publish.
publish_to: none

These pubspecs are still validated by the package validation tool. The contents are more informational as the pubspecs for these packages are not consumed by the pub tool or ecosystem.

We validate:

  • that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
  • that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
  • that a reference to a pkg/ package is done via a relative path dependency