Nicholas Shahan
f4e949609c
- Introduces a new output subdirectory `gen/utils/ddc` where the
new build targets output files. This is intended to make the
migration to the new assets easier since landing this change
shouldn't immediately break any dependencies.
- Enables building the canary and stable assets at the same time.
- Changes more names in our workflow from "dartdevc" to "ddc".
- Updates the ddc-canary-linux-chrome and
ddc-canary-linux-chrome-unsound configurations to use the
new assets.
The new outputs appear in directories that are more consistently
named, (no more sound vs kernel confusion). They are named in
preparation for the eventual deletion of the unsound targets
without any lingering cruft to be cleaned up in the sound
directories.
The new structure is:
```
gen/utils/ddc/
|- canary
| |- pkg
| |- sdk
|- canary_unsound
| |- pkg
| |- sdk
|- stable
| |- pkg
| |- sdk
|- stable-unsound
|- pkg
|- sdk
```
The 'pkg' and 'sdk' directories all contain outputs with the same
files names, each compiled in the respective build modes
(sound/unsound and stable/canary).
Change-Id: I66822ebf03bba487b6d359a8e0aa818b9e7b6bef
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/313081
Reviewed-by: Sigmund Cherem <sigmund@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Nicholas Shahan <nshahan@google.com>
Package validation
The packages in pkg/ are automatically validated on the LUCI CI bots. The
validation is largely done by the tools/package_deps package; it can be tested
locally via:
dart tools/package_deps/bin/package_deps.dart
Packages which are published
There are several packages developed in pkg/ which are published to pub.
Validation of these packages is particularly important because the pub tools are
not used for these packages during development; we get our dependency versions
from the DEPS file. Its very easy for the dependencies specified in a package's
pubspec file to get out of date wrt the packages and versions actually used.
In order to better ensure we're publishing correct packages, we validate some properties of the pubspec files on our CI system. These validations include:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that we don't use relative path deps to pkg/ or third_party/ packages
Packages which are not published
For packages in pkg/ which we do not intend to be published, we put the following comment in the pubspec.yaml file:
# This package is not intended for consumption on pub.dev. DO NOT publish.
publish_to: none
These pubspecs are still validated by the package validation tool. The contents are more informational as the pubspecs for these packages are not consumed by the pub tool or ecosystem.
We validate:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that a reference to a pkg/ package is done via a relative path dependency