Alexander Markov
048df9d706
Cloned static members of mixins are not used (dead code) and usually
tree shaken in AOT mode. However, if static member is annotated with
@pragma('vm:entry-point'), its clone in the mixin application is
also retained. If such mixin application is not used, tree shaker
drops its supertypes which removes the link from mixin application to
the original mixin. As a result, gen_snapshot crashes when trying
to access original mixin in order to print qualified name of the member.
The first part of the fix is to avoid cloning static members into
mixin applications, which would allow tree shaker to remove unused
mixin applications entirely. This change also reduces size of
the non-AOT kernel binaries.
However, instance members of mixins are cloned
and they could be annotated with entry point pragmas too.
The second part of the fix is to clear isEliminatedMixin flag
in tree shaker when dropping supertypes.
TEST=pkg/front_end/testcases/general/mixin_with_static_member.dart
TEST=pkg/vm/testcases/transformations/type_flow/transformer/regress_flutter160030.dart
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/160030
Change-Id: I1b36c4a7f64a4530c8b4799ec785f1077ce65de6
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/403963
Reviewed-by: Slava Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Package validation
The packages in pkg/ are automatically validated on the LUCI CI bots. The
validation is largely done by the tools/package_deps package; it can be tested
locally via:
dart tools/package_deps/bin/package_deps.dart
Packages which are published
There are several packages developed in pkg/ which are published to pub.
Validation of these packages is particularly important because the pub tools are
not used for these packages during development; we get our dependency versions
from the DEPS file. It's very easy for the dependencies specified in a package's
pubspec file to get out of date wrt the packages and versions actually used.
In order to better ensure we're publishing correct packages, we validate some properties of the pubspec files on our CI system. These validations include:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that we don't use relative path deps to pkg/ or third_party/ packages
Packages which are not published
For packages in pkg/ which we do not intend to be published, we put the following comment in the pubspec.yaml file:
# This package is not intended for consumption on pub.dev. DO NOT publish.
publish_to: none
These pubspecs are still validated by the package validation tool. The contents are more informational as the pubspecs for these packages are not consumed by the pub tool or ecosystem.
We validate:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that a reference to a pkg/ package is done via a relative path dependency