This test used `..` as a continuationToken (that is, it did not expect
a syntax error for `g(C<int, int> .. toString())`). This CL changes the
test to expect that to be a syntax error, and also eliminates the
static warning caused by using `?.` on a receiver with a known non-null
value (that's not relevant to the topic of this test, I just didn't
avoid it when the tests were written).
Change-Id: I275de6423710c3a598bedd2f54f4e9e7463a6d04
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/212587
Auto-Submit: Erik Ernst <eernst@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Jens Johansen <jensj@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jens Johansen <jensj@google.com>
Erik Ernst
02b2e6c23f