Danny Tuppeny
c8a74e71ef
This adds some classes for processing interactive forms (I'm splitting this from the CL that updates refactorings to simplify reviewing). The `InteractiveForm` class managers a whole form (all fields), and processes a set of fields/answers that come back from the client (which may be the full set, or a subset). It produces a list of the outstanding fields (which need to be go back to the client) as well as maintaining the full set of answers for the master field list (to use as arguments for a command, for example). I've also commented out enums/lists from the protocol code for now, because I made the field kinds `sealed` so we get exhaustiveness checking in the validation, but want to delay fully implementing those for now. See https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/63371 Change-Id: Icc4dcea8c9eab20ffbdd19ebbc69e1285464f7ec Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/505683 Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com> Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com> Reviewed-by: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Package validation
The packages in pkg/ are automatically validated on the LUCI CI bots. The
validation is largely done by the tools/package_deps package; it can be tested
locally via:
dart tools/package_deps/bin/package_deps.dart
Packages which are published
There are several packages developed in pkg/ which are published to pub.
Validation of these packages is particularly important because the pub tools are
not used for these packages during development; we get our dependency versions
from the DEPS file. It's very easy for the dependencies specified in a package's
pubspec file to get out of date wrt the packages and versions actually used.
In order to better ensure we're publishing correct packages, we validate some properties of the pubspec files on our CI system. These validations include:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that we don't use relative path deps to pkg/ or third_party/ packages
Packages which are not published
For packages in pkg/ which we do not intend to be published, we put the following comment in the pubspec.yaml file:
# This package is not intended for consumption on pub.dev. DO NOT publish.
publish_to: none
These pubspecs are still validated by the package validation tool. The contents are more informational as the pubspecs for these packages are not consumed by the pub tool or ecosystem.
We validate:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that a reference to a pkg/ package is done via a relative path dependency
Adding new packages
Run gclient sync to re-generate .dart_tool/package_config.json after adding
a new package.
Testing packages
Currently dart test can't be used to run the tests, use test.py as usual.
E.g. the command ./tools/test.py -n...<path> runs all tests with prefix
<path>.