Files
sdk/pkg
Sam Rawlins 419d70afb2 Fix message of RETURN_IN_GENERATOR; stop double reporting.
* This message should only be reported by the parser; the
  error raised in the analyzer was strictly duplicate.
* This message theoretically used to mention "async*" or
  "sync*" depending on the modifier that the function in
  question listed. However, listing one modifier or the
  other is a red herring, and may confuse the user; any
  function declared with one or the other is a "generator",
  and the error applies equally to a "generator" using one
  or the other modifier.

Bug: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/43665
Change-Id: I6ef1f5c055473170e7563222f6f0a6c56a4ad5f5
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/210801
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
2021-08-24 01:43:48 +00:00
..
2021-04-07 10:28:38 +00:00
2021-08-22 16:33:56 +00:00
2021-04-07 10:28:38 +00:00
2021-05-12 15:21:10 +00:00
2021-08-12 22:50:50 +00:00

Package validation

The packages in pkg/ are automatically validated on the LUCI CI bots. The validation is largely done by the tools/package_deps package; it can be tested locally via:

dart tools/package_deps/bin/package_deps.dart

Packages which are published

There are several packages developed in pkg/ which are published to pub. Validation of these packages is particularly important because the pub tools are not used for these packages during development; we get our dependency versions from the DEPS file. Its very easy for the dependencies specified in a package's pubspec file to get out of date wrt the packages and versions actually used.

In order to better ensure we're publishing correct packages, we validate some properties of the pubspec files on our CI system. These validations include:

  • that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
  • that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
  • that we don't use relative path deps to pkg/ or third_party/ packages

Packages which are not published

For packages in pkg/ which we do not intend to be published, we put the following comment in the pubspec.yaml file:

# This package is not intended for consumption on pub.dev. DO NOT publish.
publish_to: none

These pubspecs are still validated by the package validation tool. The contents are more informational as the pubspecs for these packages are not consumed by the pub tool or ecosystem.

We validate:

  • that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
  • that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
  • that a reference to a pkg/ package is done via a relative path dependency