Alexander Markov
5362d9536b
This reverts commit 06d7a2352e.
Reason for revert: everything crashes on vm-aot-linux-debug-simarm_x64
Original change's description:
> [vm/compiler] Change MemoryCopy to also take untagged addresses.
>
> This CL adds the ability to pass the payload address of the source
> and destination directly to the MemoryCopy instruction as an untagged
> value.
>
> The new translation of the _TypedListBase._memMoveN methods use the new
> MemoryCopy constructor, retrieving the untagged value of the data field
> of both the source and destination. This way, if inlining exposes the
> allocation of the object from which the data field is being retrieved,
> then allocation sinking can remove the intermediate allocation if there
> are no escaping uses of the object.
>
> Since Pointer.asTypedList allocates such ExternalTypedData objects,
> this CL makes that method inlined if at all possible, which removes
> the intermediate allocation if the only use of the TypedData object
> is to call setRange for memory copying purposes.
>
> This CL also separates unboxed native slots into two groups: those
> that contain untagged addresses and those that do not. The former
> group now have the kUntagged representation, which mimics the old
> use of LoadUntagged for the PointerBase data field and also ensures
> that any arithmetic operations on untagged addresses must first be
> explicitly converted to an unboxed integer and then explicitly converted
> back to untagged before being stored in a slot that contains untagged
> addresses.
>
> When a unboxed native slot that contains untagged addresses is defined,
> the definition also includes a boolean which represents whether
> addresses that may be moved by the GC can be stored in this slot or not.
> The redundancy eliminator uses this to decide whether it is safe to
> eliminate a duplicate load, replace a load with the value originally
> stored in the slot, or lift a load out of a loop.
>
> In particular, the PointerBase data field may contain GC-moveable
> addresses, but only for internal TypedData objects and views, not
> for external TypedData objects or Pointers. To allow load optimizations
> involving the latter, the LoadField and StoreField instructions now
> take boolean flags for whether loads or stores from the slot are
> guaranteed to not be GC-moveable, to override the information from
> the slot argument.
>
> Notable benchmark changes on x64 (similar for other archs unless noted):
>
> JIT:
> * FfiMemory.PointerPointer: 250.7%
> * FfiStructCopy.Copy1Bytes: -26.73% (only x64)
> * FfiStructCopy.Copy32Bytes: -25.18% (only x64)
> * MemoryCopy.64.setRange.Pointer.Uint8: 19.36%
> * MemoryCopy.64.setRange.Pointer.Double: 18.96%
> * MemoryCopy.8.setRange.Pointer.Double: 17.59%
> * MemoryCopy.8.setRange.Pointer.Uint8: 19.46%
>
> AOT:
> * FfiMemory.PointerPointer: 323.5%
> * FfiStruct.FieldLoadStore: 483.3%
> * FileIO_readwrite_64kb: 15.39%
> * FileIO_readwrite_512kb (Intel Xeon): 46.22%
> * MemoryCopy.512.setRange.Pointer.Uint8: 35.20%
> * MemoryCopy.64.setRange.Pointer.Uint8: 55.40%
> * MemoryCopy.512.setRange.Pointer.Double: 29.45%
> * MemoryCopy.64.setRange.Pointer.Double: 60.37%
> * MemoryCopy.8.setRange.Pointer.Double: 59.54%
> * MemoryCopy.8.setRange.Pointer.Uint8: 55.40%
> * FfiStructCopy.Copy32Bytes: 398.3%
> * FfiStructCopy.Copy1Bytes: 1233%
>
> TEST=vm/dart/address_local_pointer, vm/dart/pointer_as_typed_list
>
> Issue: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42072
> Fixes: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/53124
>
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:vm-ffi-qemu-linux-release-arm-try,vm-eager-optimization-linux-release-x64-try,vm-linux-release-x64-try,vm-linux-debug-x64-try,vm-aot-linux-release-x64-try,vm-aot-linux-debug-x64-try
> Change-Id: I563e0bfac5b1ac6cf1111649934067c12891b631
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/324820
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Tess Strickland <sstrickl@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Issue: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42072
Change-Id: I7c31434e01108487de69a32154bbefd1538c6f0f
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:vm-ffi-qemu-linux-release-arm-try,vm-eager-optimization-linux-release-x64-try,vm-linux-release-x64-try,vm-linux-debug-x64-try,vm-aot-linux-release-x64-try,vm-aot-linux-debug-x64-try
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/330523
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Alexander Aprelev <aam@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Aprelev <aam@google.com>
Package validation
The packages in pkg/ are automatically validated on the LUCI CI bots. The
validation is largely done by the tools/package_deps package; it can be tested
locally via:
dart tools/package_deps/bin/package_deps.dart
Packages which are published
There are several packages developed in pkg/ which are published to pub.
Validation of these packages is particularly important because the pub tools are
not used for these packages during development; we get our dependency versions
from the DEPS file. Its very easy for the dependencies specified in a package's
pubspec file to get out of date wrt the packages and versions actually used.
In order to better ensure we're publishing correct packages, we validate some properties of the pubspec files on our CI system. These validations include:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that we don't use relative path deps to pkg/ or third_party/ packages
Packages which are not published
For packages in pkg/ which we do not intend to be published, we put the following comment in the pubspec.yaml file:
# This package is not intended for consumption on pub.dev. DO NOT publish.
publish_to: none
These pubspecs are still validated by the package validation tool. The contents are more informational as the pubspecs for these packages are not consumed by the pub tool or ecosystem.
We validate:
- that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
- that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
- that a reference to a pkg/ package is done via a relative path dependency