Files
sdk/pkg
Brian Wilkerson 8f48cbcccb Record the completion location in more places
This is the first of many such CLs. We need to record the completion
everywhere that `OpType` is computing it in order to eventually be able
to stop using `OpType`. I have temporary code that compares the two
computations in order to ensure that they're the same, but I can't
commit it into prod, nor will it be useful beyond this transition.

In addition to recording the completion location in more places, this
also better handles the case when the offset is immediately before the
first character of a top-level declaration. I believe that we need to
do something similar when immedately after the last character, when
before and after class members, and when before an after statements.

Change-Id: I046675c56243981762cd06db4cd35c17989ccf27
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/348762
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
2024-01-26 21:17:19 +00:00
..
2024-01-26 16:12:29 +00:00
2024-01-20 02:06:59 +00:00

Package validation

The packages in pkg/ are automatically validated on the LUCI CI bots. The validation is largely done by the tools/package_deps package; it can be tested locally via:

dart tools/package_deps/bin/package_deps.dart

Packages which are published

There are several packages developed in pkg/ which are published to pub. Validation of these packages is particularly important because the pub tools are not used for these packages during development; we get our dependency versions from the DEPS file. Its very easy for the dependencies specified in a package's pubspec file to get out of date wrt the packages and versions actually used.

In order to better ensure we're publishing correct packages, we validate some properties of the pubspec files on our CI system. These validations include:

  • that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
  • that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
  • that we don't use relative path deps to pkg/ or third_party/ packages

Packages which are not published

For packages in pkg/ which we do not intend to be published, we put the following comment in the pubspec.yaml file:

# This package is not intended for consumption on pub.dev. DO NOT publish.
publish_to: none

These pubspecs are still validated by the package validation tool. The contents are more informational as the pubspecs for these packages are not consumed by the pub tool or ecosystem.

We validate:

  • that the dependencies listed in the pubspec are used in the package
  • that all the packages used by the source are listed in the pubspec
  • that a reference to a pkg/ package is done via a relative path dependency