Paul Berry
10d531b5f9
The ID tests for the "why not promoted" feature had some minor unintentional errors in them. This CL fixes them: - The constructor tests in argument_type_not_assignable_nullability_error.dart tried to return null from functions whose return type didn't allow it. - The compoundAssignmentRhs test in argument_type_not_assignable_nullability_error.dart tried to add an `int` to an `int?`. The CFE considers this to be an error, but also reports a follow-on error because it thinks the type of the resulting expression is `num` (which is not assignable back to `int`). To avoid the follow-on error, we use `num` for the type of the variable to which compound assignment is being applied. - The forElementInMap test in for_in_loop_type_not_iterable_nullability_error.dart wasn't a proper map (it contained two `null` elements, rather than a single map entry `null: null`, which was what was intended). There were also several tests for which we *don't* expect "why not promoted" information; I added comments explaining why. Change-Id: I91ddb88cb0f25f9b209df3eeb75d57d8270f877b Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/193561 Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Johnni Winther <johnniwinther@google.com>
FE/analyzer shared code
This package contains logic that is shared between the front_end and analyzer packages. It is intended solely to facilitate development of the Dart SDK, and is not intended for use by end users. In particular, this package has no public API, so no guarantee is made of compatibility between one version of the package and the next.
End users should consider using the analyzer package to analyze Dart source code.