This adds support for printing the DTD connection information to stdout
when --print-dtd-uri is passed.
This change also fixes an issue where DDS would fail to spawn an isolate
with the DTD snapshot when DDS was running in AOT mode. This means the
SDK must be shipped with both AppJIT and AOT DTD snapshots, at least
until dartdev is moved to run from AOT.
Fixes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/55034
TEST=run_test.dart
Change-Id: I788ef9bfe76297a8d594992a2aac440ed9e2ecac
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/358541
Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Konyi <bkonyi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenzie Davisson <kenzieschmoll@google.com>
This reverts commit 5f33a9ab80.
Reason for revert: There is speculation that this CL might have caused some errors invoking the analysis server from dartdev, leading to the error "dartdev: Error: Error when reading 'dartdev': No such file or directory"
TEST=ci
Original change's description:
> [dartdev] Use an AOT snapshot for dds
>
> This change enables use of an AOT snapshot for dds execution.
>
> TEST=ci
>
> Change-Id: I500be544e168bd487745ee1232fd925d5ef546b8
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/327140
> Reviewed-by: Ben Konyi <bkonyi@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Derek Xu <derekx@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
Change-Id: I33a53a17f53714d3df5aba539870574a631cd416
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/327523
Reviewed-by: Ben Konyi <bkonyi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
This reverts commit bc4cb123a8.
Reason for revert: breaks crossword simarm tests https://ci.chromium.org/p/dart/builders/ci.sandbox/vm-kernel-precomp-linux-debug-simarm_x64/2619
Original change's description:
> Reland "[ VM / DartDev ] Launch DartDev in an isolate within a single main Dart process"
>
> This CL changes how DartDev is run and how the run command handles executing a Dart program (will port additional commands in a separate CL). Rather than using DartDev to spawn a child process to run user code, the VM will instead launch a DartDev isolate after doing some VM options processing. DartDev will communicate information like exit codes and script/arg pairs with the VM via isolate ports. Once DartDev runs to completion and notifies the VM that a script should be run, the VM will move on to spawning another isolate with user code and continue executing in the same VM process.
>
> By moving DartDev into an isolate within the same process that user code will eventually run in we're able to resolve the following issues that arose due to signal handling and IPC issues:
>
> VM hangs when --enable-vm-service is supplied and there are compile time errors (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42630)
> Dart daemon spinning in exit code handler / zombie Dart processes (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41978)
> Signal handling in children of 'dartdev run' is problematic (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42092)
>
> This reverts commit 3849b5061c.
>
> Change-Id: I4fd3ba33840771a9f284d733c4a25fac6cde64ca
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/154706
> Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
TBR=bkonyi@google.com,asiva@google.com
Change-Id: I649d94c668417f2edbfd7039fa5c876e10dc32fe
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/154800
Reviewed-by: Alexander Aprelev <aam@google.com>
This CL changes how DartDev is run and how the run command handles executing a Dart program (will port additional commands in a separate CL). Rather than using DartDev to spawn a child process to run user code, the VM will instead launch a DartDev isolate after doing some VM options processing. DartDev will communicate information like exit codes and script/arg pairs with the VM via isolate ports. Once DartDev runs to completion and notifies the VM that a script should be run, the VM will move on to spawning another isolate with user code and continue executing in the same VM process.
By moving DartDev into an isolate within the same process that user code will eventually run in we're able to resolve the following issues that arose due to signal handling and IPC issues:
VM hangs when --enable-vm-service is supplied and there are compile time errors (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42630)
Dart daemon spinning in exit code handler / zombie Dart processes (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41978)
Signal handling in children of 'dartdev run' is problematic (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42092)
This reverts commit 3849b5061c.
Change-Id: I4fd3ba33840771a9f284d733c4a25fac6cde64ca
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/154706
Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
This reverts commit ffe258d2d4.
Reason for revert: Failures on bots
Original change's description:
> [ VM / DartDev ] Launch DartDev in an isolate within a single main Dart process
>
> This CL changes how DartDev is run and how the run command handles executing a Dart program (will port additional commands in a separate CL). Rather than using DartDev to spawn a child process to run user code, the VM will instead launch a DartDev isolate after doing some VM options processing. DartDev will communicate information like exit codes and script/arg pairs with the VM via isolate ports. Once DartDev runs to completion and notifies the VM that a script should be run, the VM will move on to spawning another isolate with user code and continue executing in the same VM process.
>
> By moving DartDev into an isolate within the same process that user code will eventually run in we're able to resolve the following issues that arose due to signal handling and IPC issues:
>
> VM hangs when --enable-vm-service is supplied and there are compile time errors (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42630)
> Dart daemon spinning in exit code handler / zombie Dart processes (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41978)
> Signal handling in children of 'dartdev run' is problematic (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41978)
>
> Change-Id: I1c6b1425831b691ad20284716aa80f817dbaf607
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/152588
> Commit-Queue: Ben Konyi <bkonyi@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com>
TBR=bkonyi@google.com,rmacnak@google.com,asiva@google.com
Change-Id: Idb1d24a4524bdc3ccfb199a82710f3c0d9db539a
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/154702
Reviewed-by: Ben Konyi <bkonyi@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Konyi <bkonyi@google.com>
This CL changes how DartDev is run and how the run command handles executing a Dart program (will port additional commands in a separate CL). Rather than using DartDev to spawn a child process to run user code, the VM will instead launch a DartDev isolate after doing some VM options processing. DartDev will communicate information like exit codes and script/arg pairs with the VM via isolate ports. Once DartDev runs to completion and notifies the VM that a script should be run, the VM will move on to spawning another isolate with user code and continue executing in the same VM process.
By moving DartDev into an isolate within the same process that user code will eventually run in we're able to resolve the following issues that arose due to signal handling and IPC issues:
VM hangs when --enable-vm-service is supplied and there are compile time errors (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/42630)
Dart daemon spinning in exit code handler / zombie Dart processes (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41978)
Signal handling in children of 'dartdev run' is problematic (https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/41978)
Change-Id: I1c6b1425831b691ad20284716aa80f817dbaf607
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/152588
Commit-Queue: Ben Konyi <bkonyi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Macnak <rmacnak@google.com>