Collects files from `package:async_helper` and `tests/language`
that are generally useful, so that all test-related helpers are
in `package:expect`.
Moves the two libraries from `package:async_helper` into `package:expect`,
and the `tests/language/static_type_helper.dart` file too.
Deprecates `async_minitest.dart`, to follow `minitest.dart`,
expecting the Flutter use of it to have been fixed to not break
on deprecation (I believe Flutter no longer breaks builds on deprecations at all).
Patch 1 is the actual change.
Patch 2+4+8 is changing all existing references to the files.
Patch 6 ignores deprecation in files still using `async_minitest.dart`.
3+5+7+9 are updating this text to make the numbers match.
Then it's just test-expectations and small tweaks from there.
Change-Id: I1b665135b5fef9b9a0c3b340ffe9daf874d0174c
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/373120
Reviewed-by: Nate Bosch <nbosch@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Devon Carew <devoncarew@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
This reverts commit c97f7b7fad.
Reason for revert: Still breaking google3 (b/236665701)
Original change's description:
> Make `nullFuture` be per-zone.
>
> We introduced a `nullFuture` during the null-safety migration where
> we changed some methods to no longer allow returning `null`,
> and they therefore had to return a `Future`.
> That affected timing, because returning `null` was processed
> synchronously, and that change in timing made some tests fail.
> Rather that fix the fragile tests, we made the function return
> a recognizable future, a canonical `Future<Null>.value(null)`,
> and then recognized it and took a synchronous path for it.
>
> That caused other issues, because the future was created in the
> root zone. (Well, originally, it was created in the first zone
> which needed one, that was worse. Now it's created in the root zone.)
> Some code tries to contain asynchrony inside a custom zone, and
> then the get a `nullFuture` and calls `then` on it, and that
> schedules a microtask in the root zone.
> (It should probably have used the listener's zone, and not store
> a zone in the future at all, but that's how it was first done,
> and now people rely on that behavior too.)
>
> This change creates a `null` future *per zone* (lazily initialized
> when asked for). That should be sufficient because the code recognizing
> a returned `null` future is generally running in the same zone,
> but if any other code gets the `nullFuture`, it will be in the
> expected zone for where it was requested.
>
> This is a reland of commit a247b158d6
>
> Change-Id: Ieec74d6f93c57175c357ec18889144635f5bdca6
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/249490
> Commit-Queue: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Erik Ernst <eernst@google.com>
TBR=lrn@google.com,eernst@google.com,nbosch@google.com
Change-Id: I870285b03ec05803c5aaa6b66f9a6e6ea360d732
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/249609
Reviewed-by: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Emmanuel Pellereau <emmanuelp@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Pellereau <emmanuelp@google.com>
We introduced a `nullFuture` during the null-safety migration where
we changed some methods to no longer allow returning `null`,
and they therefore had to return a `Future`.
That affected timing, because returning `null` was processed
synchronously, and that change in timing made some tests fail.
Rather that fix the fragile tests, we made the function return
a recognizable future, a canonical `Future<Null>.value(null)`,
and then recognized it and took a synchronous path for it.
That caused other issues, because the future was created in the
root zone. (Well, originally, it was created in the first zone
which needed one, that was worse. Now it's created in the root zone.)
Some code tries to contain asynchrony inside a custom zone, and
then the get a `nullFuture` and calls `then` on it, and that
schedules a microtask in the root zone.
(It should probably have used the listener's zone, and not store
a zone in the future at all, but that's how it was first done,
and now people rely on that behavior too.)
This change creates a `null` future *per zone* (lazily initialized
when asked for). That should be sufficient because the code recognizing
a returned `null` future is generally running in the same zone,
but if any other code gets the `nullFuture`, it will be in the
expected zone for where it was requested.
This is a reland of commit a247b158d6
Change-Id: Ieec74d6f93c57175c357ec18889144635f5bdca6
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/249490
Commit-Queue: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Ernst <eernst@google.com>
This reverts commit 4d750a862d.
Reason for revert: breaks google3 (b/236665701)
Original change's description:
> Make `nullFuture` be per-zone.
>
> We introduced a `nullFuture` during the null-safety migration where
> we changed some methods to no longer allow returning `null`,
> and they therefore had to return a `Future`.
> That affected timing, because returning `null` was processed
> synchronously, and that change in timing made some tests fail.
> Rather that fix the fragile tests, we made the function return
> a recognizable future, a canonical `Future<Null>.value(null)`,
> and then recognized it and took a synchronous path for it.
>
> That caused other issues, because the future was created in the
> root zone. (Well, originally, it was created in the first zone
> which needed one, that was worse. Now it's created in the root zone.)
> Some code tries to contain asynchrony inside a custom zone, and
> then the get a `nullFuture` and calls `then` on it, and that
> schedules a microtask in the root zone.
> (It should probably have used the listener's zone, and not store
> a zone in the future at all, but that's how it was first done,
> and now people rely on that behavior too.)
>
> This change creates a `null` future *per zone* (lazily initialized
> when asked for). That should be sufficient because the code recognizing
> a returned `null` future is generally running in the same zone,
> but if any other code gets the `nullFuture`, it will be in the
> expected zone for where it was requested.
>
> This is a reland of commit a247b158d6
>
> Change-Id: Ia113756de1f6d50af4b1abfec219d6b4dcd5d59b
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/249488
> Reviewed-by: Nate Bosch <nbosch@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
TBR=lrn@google.com,nbosch@google.com
Change-Id: I02d62d58bae33d6a606a80eb3eee2e8e721a8e20
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/249620
Commit-Queue: Emmanuel Pellereau <emmanuelp@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Pellereau <emmanuelp@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nate Bosch <nbosch@google.com>
We introduced a `nullFuture` during the null-safety migration where
we changed some methods to no longer allow returning `null`,
and they therefore had to return a `Future`.
That affected timing, because returning `null` was processed
synchronously, and that change in timing made some tests fail.
Rather that fix the fragile tests, we made the function return
a recognizable future, a canonical `Future<Null>.value(null)`,
and then recognized it and took a synchronous path for it.
That caused other issues, because the future was created in the
root zone. (Well, originally, it was created in the first zone
which needed one, that was worse. Now it's created in the root zone.)
Some code tries to contain asynchrony inside a custom zone, and
then the get a `nullFuture` and calls `then` on it, and that
schedules a microtask in the root zone.
(It should probably have used the listener's zone, and not store
a zone in the future at all, but that's how it was first done,
and now people rely on that behavior too.)
This change creates a `null` future *per zone* (lazily initialized
when asked for). That should be sufficient because the code recognizing
a returned `null` future is generally running in the same zone,
but if any other code gets the `nullFuture`, it will be in the
expected zone for where it was requested.
This is a reland of commit a247b158d6
Change-Id: Ia113756de1f6d50af4b1abfec219d6b4dcd5d59b
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/249488
Reviewed-by: Nate Bosch <nbosch@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
This reverts commit a247b158d6.
Reason for revert: breaks google3. See b/236665701.
Original change's description:
> Make `nullFuture` be per-zone.
>
> We introduced a `nullFuture` during the null-safety migration where
> we changed some methods to no longer allow returning `null`,
> and they therefore had to return a `Future`.
> That affected timing, because returning `null` was processed
> synchronously, and that change in timing made some tests fail.
> Rather that fix the fragile tests, we made the function return
> a recognizable future, a canonical `Future<Null>.value(null)`,
> and then recognized it and took a synchronous path for it.
>
> That caused other issues, because the future was created in the
> root zone. (Well, originally, it was created in the first zone
> which needed one, that was worse. Now it's created in the root zone.)
> Some code tries to contain asynchrony inside a custom zone, and
> then the get a `nullFuture` and calls `then` on it, and that
> schedules a microtask in the root zone.
> (It should probably have used the listener's zone, and not store
> a zone in the future at all, but that's how it was first done,
> and now people rely on that behavior too.)
>
> This change creates a `null` future *per zone* (lazily initialized
> when asked for). That should be sufficient because the code recognizing
> a returned `null` future is generally running in the same zone,
> but if any other code gets the `nullFuture`, it will be in the
> expected zone for where it was requested.
>
> Change-Id: Ibe204eaabe175cbcbcb7822ca1f2bcdda72a478c
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/248660
> Reviewed-by: Nate Bosch <nbosch@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
TBR=lrn@google.com,nbosch@google.com
Change-Id: Ic765eb1401dbff4dea6c08c007c0bf9aff186684
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/249188
Reviewed-by: Oleh Prypin <oprypin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Johnni Winther <johnniwinther@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Pellereau <emmanuelp@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daco Harkes <dacoharkes@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Emmanuel Pellereau <emmanuelp@google.com>
We introduced a `nullFuture` during the null-safety migration where
we changed some methods to no longer allow returning `null`,
and they therefore had to return a `Future`.
That affected timing, because returning `null` was processed
synchronously, and that change in timing made some tests fail.
Rather that fix the fragile tests, we made the function return
a recognizable future, a canonical `Future<Null>.value(null)`,
and then recognized it and took a synchronous path for it.
That caused other issues, because the future was created in the
root zone. (Well, originally, it was created in the first zone
which needed one, that was worse. Now it's created in the root zone.)
Some code tries to contain asynchrony inside a custom zone, and
then the get a `nullFuture` and calls `then` on it, and that
schedules a microtask in the root zone.
(It should probably have used the listener's zone, and not store
a zone in the future at all, but that's how it was first done,
and now people rely on that behavior too.)
This change creates a `null` future *per zone* (lazily initialized
when asked for). That should be sufficient because the code recognizing
a returned `null` future is generally running in the same zone,
but if any other code gets the `nullFuture`, it will be in the
expected zone for where it was requested.
Change-Id: Ibe204eaabe175cbcbcb7822ca1f2bcdda72a478c
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/248660
Reviewed-by: Nate Bosch <nbosch@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Lasse Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
Robert Nystrom