Currently we test dartdevk against SDK/packages that were compiled with
dartdevc (DDC+Analyzer). This CL migrates to having those files compiled
with DDC+Kernel. dartdevc testing is unchanged.
Most of the fixes are around things like special optimized annotations
used in our SDK code, that were not understood by DDK. Also some inline
JS type annoations were not correct.
Change-Id: Iccf4427e4b9beffd6d97a4be654253d91f6cb89e
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/57800
Reviewed-by: Vijay Menon <vsm@google.com>
Renames the target to dartdevk_sdk (to match dartdevc_sdk), and switches
dartdevk_sdk and dartdevc_test_pkg to use prebuilt_dart_action.
Change-Id: Ib31c85c46743a005bb95cf888055a4d093ffe07f
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/57481
Reviewed-by: Vijay Menon <vsm@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Jenny Messerly <jmesserly@google.com>
This involves a few main pieces:
- Add code to the GN scripts to generate DDC's patched SDK and then
compile it to summaries and JS in the build output directory.
- Add support to the underlying DDC build scripts to support controlling
which files are built where.
- Update test.dart to use the DDC SDK from the build directory.
- Update create_sdk to use the built SDK instead of the checked in one.
- Fix various internal DDC tools to build their own copy of the SDK
(since they can't easily find the one in the build directory because
it's path if config-specific) and use those.
- Delete the checked DDC SDK JS and summaries.
I think I got everything working. The built Dart SDK looks fine -- it's
identical to one built using the old build scripts.
The various tools and DDC's little test runner I *think* work, but there
may be a bug or two in there. I tried the various things I could and it
seems like they work but it's hard to tell since they may be kind of
broken right now anyway.
Bug:
Change-Id: Iea77915a5c1cc8450f60ebfbdf8c725c7ea2f32c
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/18144
Commit-Queue: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Anderson <zra@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Menon <vsm@google.com>
Jenny Messerly