This does not remove the computation of available declarations. This CL
seemed big enough without that, so I (or someone else) can get that in
the next CL.
Change-Id: I67ab49b75c8a415ccfaef16c4e49a00026a6091f
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/341160
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This is cleanup work required to start enforcing this with static
analysis, as per dart-lang/sdk#53253.
Real quick this issue is that this code is unsafe:
```dart
void f(Completer<int> c, int? i) {
Future<int>.value(i); // Ouch!
c.complete(i); // Ouch!
}
```
Change-Id: I12c4f0a92a2071fb47759d9626689e00cfa42f8d
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/324763
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
* 99% of these are `Future ` --> `Future<void> `
* There are some `test_` methods which declare a return type of `Future` which
is non-idiomatic, I think, but in order to create a pragmatic consistency, I
added `<void>` to the few test methods in these libraries. Later if we
desire, we can remove all of the return types.
* Also a few `Completer ` --> `Completer<void> ` and
`Stream ` --> `Stream<Object?> `
* There are many remaining cases in `lib/`
Change-Id: I41cd51bab6886788e15ac7065dd21e95e789d09f
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/287260
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
I am going to plumb some of this support through the flutter_tools
side, and want a consistent name for this port. 'servicePort' seems to
be more correct.
Change-Id: I73806e1d4c566a82605812504cb354c2b59710ea
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/280562
Auto-Submit: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
When getting completions, some of the "contributers" basically do a
walk of the AST and almost add everything they see, and the list
is then later pruned based on the user query.
This CL introduces a "first pruning" (a copy of the first part of what
is done in the subsequent pruning) so only the things has could match
the user query is added.
Benchmarks for this:
Notes:
- All of these numbers are with the timeout increased a lot (to a
point where there effectivley isn't any timeout).
- I have an external project too, but only in Android Studio as it's
a Flutter project and my VSCode then uses the dart included in
flutter. I don't know how to make it not do that.
Summary:
Android Studio, bin/server.dart --- `print(CallHierarchyK^);`
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-46.45 +/- 10.0349
-45.7861% +/- 9.8915%
(Student's t, pooled s = 15.6785)
Android Studio, bin/server.dart --- `starter.^;`
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
Android Studio, Other project --- `print(Cryptm^);`
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-90.3 +/- 10.9506
-58.0894% +/- 7.04448%
(Student's t, pooled s = 17.1092)
VSCode, bin/server.dart --- `print(CallHierarchyK^);`
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-61.45 +/- 5.41501
-51.4226% +/- 4.53139%
(Student's t, pooled s = 8.46036)
VSCode, bin/server.dart --- `starter.^;`
Difference at 95.0% confidence
6.4 +/- 5.08317
15.4217% +/- 12.2486%
(Student's t, pooled s = 7.94189)
So for several queries it's ~50% faster. For a single one it slightly slower.
Raw numbers:
BEFORE:
Android Studio, bin/server.dart --- `print(CallHierarchyK^);`
90 ms
88 ms
89 ms
85 ms
139 ms
92 ms
86 ms
101 ms
87 ms
84 ms
112 ms
110 ms
128 ms
99 ms
99 ms
104 ms
98 ms
88 ms
106 ms
144 ms
Android Studio, bin/server.dart --- `starter.^;`
38 ms
38 ms
34 ms
30 ms
35 ms
34 ms
29 ms
31 ms
35 ms
60 ms
53 ms
37 ms
54 ms
31 ms
51 ms
33 ms
39 ms
68 ms
75 ms
91 ms
Android Studio, Other project --- `print(Cryptm^);`
150 ms
146 ms
142 ms
138 ms
150 ms
213 ms
147 ms
143 ms
149 ms
147 ms
153 ms
147 ms
136 ms
151 ms
151 ms
186 ms
160 ms
153 ms
150 ms
197 ms
VSCode, bin/server.dart --- `print(CallHierarchyK^);`
122 ms
113 ms
115 ms
118 ms
124 ms
116 ms
116 ms
114 ms
118 ms
125 ms
130 ms
117 ms
104 ms
119 ms
121 ms
120 ms
127 ms
123 ms
117 ms
131 ms
VSCode, bin/server.dart --- `starter.^;`
38 ms
45 ms
35 ms
37 ms
37 ms
59 ms
39 ms
38 ms
37 ms
44 ms
41 ms
41 ms
43 ms
41 ms
39 ms
40 ms
42 ms
43 ms
49 ms
42 ms
WITH CL:
Android Studio, bin/server.dart --- `print(CallHierarchyK^);`
65 ms
59 ms
41 ms
41 ms
70 ms
38 ms
56 ms
66 ms
64 ms
44 ms
47 ms
56 ms
46 ms
38 ms
46 ms
64 ms
57 ms
44 ms
69 ms
89 ms
Android Studio, bin/server.dart --- `starter.^;`
36 ms
36 ms
38 ms
35 ms
37 ms
43 ms
32 ms
30 ms
34 ms
39 ms
32 ms
40 ms
35 ms
34 ms
35 ms
39 ms
46 ms
54 ms
56 ms
78 ms
Android Studio, Other project --- `print(Cryptm^);`
59 ms
63 ms
61 ms
80 ms
98 ms
56 ms
60 ms
61 ms
57 ms
61 ms
57 ms
61 ms
59 ms
59 ms
57 ms
64 ms
60 ms
65 ms
58 ms
107 ms
VSCode, bin/server.dart --- `print(CallHierarchyK^);`
55 ms
54 ms
50 ms
47 ms
59 ms
55 ms
53 ms
53 ms
67 ms
67 ms
54 ms
54 ms
50 ms
62 ms
54 ms
54 ms
56 ms
59 ms
63 ms
95 ms
VSCode, bin/server.dart --- `starter.^;`
57 ms
41 ms
57 ms
40 ms
45 ms
47 ms
40 ms
44 ms
43 ms
43 ms
41 ms
40 ms
42 ms
49 ms
40 ms
46 ms
57 ms
49 ms
81 ms
56 ms
https://github.com/flutter/flutter-intellij/issues/6470
Change-Id: I1e34ce04774cafcb47f4e8590b990400a7b0f0ad
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/279389
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Jens Johansen <jensj@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
I think we don't expect that users will write plugins that use these
types. So, we can remove the indirection.
Similarly, CompletionRequest is also currently de-facto a Dart
completion request, because it has `ResolvedUnitResult result`. I will
fold it into DartCompletionRequest in a future CL.
Change-Id: I2ea1d443ae18535f8c72f785dd1b91cf8d30ffa7
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/218021
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
As per our earlier conversation, I looked for places where a local
variable was introduced to overcome field promotion and has the same
name as the field. Where possible I made them final; where not possible
I changed the name.
Change-Id: Iad3d2139693ca66f1eb22a3926c3b84a4115f13d
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/196552
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This should allow doing partial migration, specifically protocol files,
which are imported by other libraries, but are a small library cycle
that does not import much outside of it.
Change-Id: I904c05d6d5b444ee9a9dbd1f7ada12aabdcc5165
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/193583
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Brian Wilkerson