When creating new instructions that inherit a token position that
represents a source location from another instruction, the inheriting
instruction must also have the same inlining ID in order for the source
position represented by the token position to be looked up in the
correct script.
Force this by wrapping both in a single InstructionSource struct which
is taken by instructions which take token positions instead of just a
token position. That way, it's more work to manually transfer the token
position separately from the inlining ID of the instruction than doing
the right thing of transfering both at once.
To ensure this information is kept consistent, we pass InstructionSource
structs through the FlowGraphCompiler all the way down to the
CodeSourceMapBuilder.
This CL also makes the following changes:
* Cache the upper bound of source positions in scripts and use it to add
a check for if a given real token position is valid for the script
without iterating over the line starts data for each token position.
* Start inlining intervals appropriately when adding descriptor and
null check information to the code source map.
Code size changes are minimal on Flutter gallery in release mode
(<0.05% decrease).
TEST=Existing tests on trybots, with manual checking with
--check-token-positions that previous errors are now removed.
Bug: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/44436
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.dart.try:vm-kernel-precomp-nnbd-linux-debug-x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-linux-debug-x64-try,vm-kernel-nnbd-linux-debug-x64-try,vm-kernel-linux-debug-x64-try,vm-kernel-linux-release-x64-try,vm-kernel-nnbd-linux-release-x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-linux-release-x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-nnbd-linux-release-x64-try,vm-kernel-linux-product-x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-linux-product-x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-linux-debug-simarm_x64-try,vm-kernel-precomp-linux-release-simarm64-try,vm-kernel-linux-release-simarm64-try,vm-kernel-linux-release-simarm-try,vm-kernel-linux-release-ia32-try
Change-Id: I23ced262cb4e9fe9d81356f409e7e8d220d63ee0
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/173967
Reviewed-by: Régis Crelier <regis@google.com>
#if defined(DART_PRECOMPILED_RUNTIME)
#error "AOT runtime should not use compiler sources (including header files)"
#endif // defined(DART_PRECOMPILED_RUNTIME)
Remove #if defined(DART_PRECOMPILED_RUNTIME) from most compiler sources.
Change-Id: Id175c83fdbea38d9d5e1371ff433e3888f2afe8a
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/143523
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Rationale:
Previous method cached graph information (instruction and call site
counts) on a per-function level, not accounting for potential
specializations. The improved method runs an extra constant folding
pass, and only caches per-function information for non-specialized
cases. As a result, we inling much better, see for example, the
added test as illustration.
Since we no longer cache for constants, compile-time may be increased
a bit due to the extra scan. In the long run we should consider
for common constant "situations" as the call site.
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/36880
Change-Id: I19f007c7f1860ad0ea88fafb38695dc154189ad5
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/105460
Commit-Queue: Aart Bik <ajcbik@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
- Introduce a slimmed down version of thread.h, which just depends on the
Zone and StackResource.
- Introduce a layering check that would prevent the coupling in the future.
This is the first step towards decoupling compiler from runtime.
There are multiple reasons to introduce the decoupling but the main
reason currently is to introduce a controlled surface through which
compiler reaches into runtime to catch any places where runtime word size
might influence the compiler and then enable building compiler that
targets 32-bit runtime but is embedded into a 64-bit runtime.
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31709
Change-Id: Id63ebbaddca55dd097298e51c90d957a73fa476e
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/87182
Commit-Queue: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
The inliner assumes that the last instruction replacing the original
call is a definition so it can replace all the uses of the call.
Unfortunately, we have a couple of instructions (StoreIndexed and
StoreInstanceField) that are not _really_ definitions.
Change FlowGraphInliner::TryInlineRecognizedMethod to create a
distinction between the last instruction to be inlined and the
definition that should be used as the new result. For inlines that end
in a StoreIndexed or StoreInstanceField, use the null constant as the
new result.
Further work towards a better fix for https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/35481
Change-Id: I5a9effe44388de9f03681565b1de2cf2c46e91c6
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/88960
Commit-Queue: Stevie Strickland <sstrickl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Similar to how we treat catch entry instructions, this cl adds new
function and osr entry instructions. The [FunctionEntry] and
[OsrEntry] - just like [CatchBlockEntry] - have now their own initial
definitions. The [GraphEntry] has only initial definitions for
constants.
Explicit phis are inserted for all parameter / special parameter
instructions if necessary.
Future work is:
a) Minimize parallel moves due to the phis on parameters
b) Cleanup frame setup: Move it entirely into FunctionEntry/CatchEntry
(instead of the split version we have now)
Fixes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/34435
Fixes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/34287
Change-Id: Iefa0280a709716f748d6fb0523b8d0f4d8de1fec
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/74782
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Rationale:
Handles remaining polymorphic reason for typed_data
setters and getters (internal vs. external) during inlining.
Also introduces high level flow graph utilities that
can be reused throughout the compiler to reduce
future code duplication. Disables type speculation
for 64-bit AOT Dart2 to make all work.
Performance:
About 4x speedup on micro benchmarks (AOT64).
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/33205
Change-Id: I678426719e49cd8aa1e5051523da12178120b3ba
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/59000
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Aart Bik <ajcbik@google.com>
Previously we would sometimes build specifically hand-crafted flow graph
code for recognized methods and sometimes let the normal flow graph
builder do it (depending on whether inlining was triggered via
[CallSiteInliner] or [CallSpecializer]).
This CL makes us use the hand-crafted flow graph building for recognized
methods in both cases.
Change-Id: I58405b16adca810fd7ccff32027b9d4a13858976
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/17445
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
When deciding whether to inline a function that has already been optimized
once, take a look at how many levels of inlining took place when it was
optimized stand-alone. If we don't have that much depth budget left, don't
inline. This is an attempt to avoid the situation where we inline a function
that was already optimized, and then fail to inline important things that are
in the inner loop.
The benchmarking server shows about a 3% improvement on average when running
the DartJS compiler.
This is a reland of https://codereview.chromium.org/2994283002/
Bug
R=vegorov@google.com
Change-Id: Ib2d1f0daad5d68d140bf0266c362dded7a4ea36b
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/7706
Commit-Queue: Erik Corry <erikcorry@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
When deciding whether to inline a function that has already been optimized
once, take a look at how many levels of inlining took place when it was
optimized stand-alone. If we don't have that much depth budget left, don't
inline. This is an attempt to avoid the situation where we inline a function
that was already optimized, and then fail to inline important things that are
in the inner loop.
The benchmarking server shows about a 3% improvement on average when running
the DartJS compiler
This was reviewed and LGTMed at https://codereview.chromium.org/2994283002
Bug:
Change-Id: Ia731c89f32ac4eacd643965a36dcee35f610c141
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/7544
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
New folder structure (nested under vm/):
- compiler/
- jit/ - JIT specific code
- aot/ - AOT specific code
- backend/ - all middle-end and back-end code (IL, flow graph)
- assembler/ - assemblers and disassemblers
- frontend/ - front ends (AST -> IL, Kernel -> IL)
compiler/README.md would be the documentation root for the compiler
pipeline
Bug: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/30575
Change-Id: I2dfd9688793bff737f7632ddc77fca766875ce36
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/2940
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Tess Strickland