Adds a @pragma("vm:recognized", <kind>) to all recognized methods, where
<kind> is one of "intrinsic", "graph" or "other", corresponding to the
kind of recognized method.
When running in debug mode, it is checked that all recognized methods
are marked with the correct kind of pragma, and that all methods marked
with the pragma are in fact recognized.
This enables kernel-level analyses and optimizations to query whether
a method is recognized by the VM.
TEST=Asserts that check the correspondence both ways, covered by test
suite, in particular the various CompileAll tests that compile all code.
Change-Id: I12f3305c72a93ecb1aefae2d66e3d9a7dae23b44
Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/168951
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
A field/function annotated with this pragma must be guaranteed to not
return `null` at runtime.
Make use of this non-nullable annotation in the VM's type propagator.
Annotates the "_TypedListView._typedData" field to ensure the VM knows it
returns a non-nullable _TypedListView.
Furthermore annotates methods on the integer implementation. Those particular
methods are recognized methods with a "dynamic" return type. This caused
the type propagator to use CompileType::Dynamic() as result type. Since a
previous CL started to only utilize the annotated type if it is better than
"dynamic" more integer operations got handled in-line, though with null-checks.
Annotating those methods to return non-null improves the in-line handling of
integer operations.
This improves dart-aot
On arm7hf:
SHA256: +5%, SHA: +6%, JsonObjectRoundTrip: +7%, ...
On arm8:
SHA1: +28%, MD5: +25%, SHA256: +15%, TypedData.Int16ListViewBench: +18.5%, StringInterpolation: +18%, ...
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31954
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/35154
Change-Id: Ia4263a37241a36c9dc35e8a48893297effa6f4b2
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/84421
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>