This removes the conservative exclusion of everything below num in the
unboxer, and it allows some methods marked as entry points to not be
entry points, as they are not actually referred explicitly in VM code.
TEST=Existing test suite.
Change-Id: If465b9081ac278a105ba99c23a49f5516b7bfbc0
Cq-Do-Not-Cancel-Tryjobs: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/169401
Commit-Queue: Aske Simon Christensen <askesc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Normally, TFA runs after constant evaluation and it expects @pragma
annotations in the evaluated form. In unit tests TFA runs after
front-end and it was expecting @pragma annotations in the expression
form. With constants-update-2018 front-end starts evaluating constants,
so TFA unit tests should switch from ExpressionPragmaAnnotationParser
to ConstantPragmaAnnotationParser.
This CL does not update test expectations as flag is not flipped yet.
Test expectations should be updated when flipping a flag using
tools/test.py -m release --vm-options -DupdateExpectations=true pkg/vm
Change-Id: I94ee2de9f70328ce3ed3ffd9902a92eeb26d3a29
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/108840
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Samir Jindel <sjindel@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Pkg/vm tests were adjusted after constant evaluation was enabled in the front-end.
As constant evaluation was reverted (4b7d256a06),
we also need to revert corresponding changes in pkg/vm unit tests.
Revert "[vm/bytecode] Update expectations for bytecode generator unit test"
This reverts commit 734c50cbf2.
Revert "[vm/aot/tfa] Update TFA tests after front-end starts evaluating constants"
This reverts commit 25cb45c02f.
Change-Id: I2fcc30571bec2dd904925724ddb7105567c7ecda
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/99782
Reviewed-by: Siva Annamalai <asiva@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Usually TFA takes kernel AST with all constants evaluated.
However, in order to avoid calling constant evaluator pass in TFA unit tests
there is a special implementation of pragma annotation parser (for testing)
which accepts annotations which are not ConstantExpressions.
After CFE starts evaluating all constants (constant-update-2018 was enabled in
e9ca6a5335), TFA unit tests need be
switched to use ConstantPragmaAnnotationParser.
Also, empty environment defines are passed to CFE to avoid unevaluated constants
and unit test expectations are updated.
Closes https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/36602
Change-Id: I2e7b0647e065cca129449b4531c6278c1d98061d
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/99269
Reviewed-by: Samir Jindel <sjindel@google.com>
A field/function annotated with this pragma must be guaranteed to not
return `null` at runtime.
Make use of this non-nullable annotation in the VM's type propagator.
Annotates the "_TypedListView._typedData" field to ensure the VM knows it
returns a non-nullable _TypedListView.
Furthermore annotates methods on the integer implementation. Those particular
methods are recognized methods with a "dynamic" return type. This caused
the type propagator to use CompileType::Dynamic() as result type. Since a
previous CL started to only utilize the annotated type if it is better than
"dynamic" more integer operations got handled in-line, though with null-checks.
Annotating those methods to return non-null improves the in-line handling of
integer operations.
This improves dart-aot
On arm7hf:
SHA256: +5%, SHA: +6%, JsonObjectRoundTrip: +7%, ...
On arm8:
SHA1: +28%, MD5: +25%, SHA256: +15%, TypedData.Int16ListViewBench: +18.5%, StringInterpolation: +18%, ...
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31954
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/35154
Change-Id: Ia4263a37241a36c9dc35e8a48893297effa6f4b2
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/84421
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>