This should enable strong mode tests to be fully NNBD opted in. At the
same time, legacy tests when run with the experiment off should
hopefully be able to still consume these libraries because they don't
actually use any NNBD features.
To do this, I changed the script that generates the SDK repo's package
config to not put in a language version for any package whose pubspec
has no SDK version. According to language versioning, that means the
package should be considered to be at the "current" version of the SDK
running the code.
In NNBD, that's opted in. With the experiment off, that is (presumably)
"opted out" in the sense that NNBD doesn't exist.
In order to *not* opt in some of the other packages that currently
lack SDK constraints, I put those in and pinned them to "^2.7.0" which
was what the package config script used to implicitly fill in for them.
I see a bunch of other changes in the generated package config too. The
update script probably hasn't been run in a while.
Change-Id: I55193d42eac0696a6b0105546551efa45a1f3252
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/144305
Auto-Submit: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Leaf Petersen <leafp@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
Not sure this entirely a good goal, but this is attempt to make package:expect
NNBD-agnostic. I.e., make the same code compile with or without the "non-nullable"
experiment enabled in order to avoid forking for tests.
I am still hitting two errors with NNBD - see comments. They both appear to be
bugs with type promotion + NNBD.
Change-Id: Ibf444a20c484daa38fdb88b92a26c4acac833d1a
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/113924
Commit-Queue: Vijay Menon <vsm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Leaf Petersen <leafp@google.com>
This reverts commit 09eed74a8a.
Reason for revert: Too much SDK code is not yet compliant.
Original change's description:
> Make `void` a static warning to use almost everywhere.
>
> Changed the hint to a StaticWarningCode, since that's the new spec'd
> error type and the hint is no longer needed.
>
> Added a new set of methods to test the cases.
>
> Didn't try to solve the problem generally ("all usages except ... are
> errors" means it easier, in theory, to make a ReportVoidExpressions
> style visitor that catches absolutely all types) because most of the
> work is actually about suppressing errors that are no longer needed.
> Ie, from NO_SUCH_METHOD to USAGE_OF_VOID_RESULT which means we have to
> put the void handling logic into each AST method specially anyway.
>
> Some redundant tests removed.
>
> Don't flag: ternaries, void -> void assignments, void returns in
> dynamic.
>
> Change-Id: Ief8035dcfe582b36b6372180ddcf4e453d320d9c
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/37441
> Commit-Queue: Mike Fairhurst <mfairhurst@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Leaf Petersen <leafp@google.com>
TBR=leafp@google.com,scheglov@google.com,mfairhurst@google.com
Change-Id: I13ee4c6939468d35506779ade637a040833632f4
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/39848
Reviewed-by: Mike Fairhurst <mfairhurst@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Fairhurst <mfairhurst@google.com>
Changed the hint to a StaticWarningCode, since that's the new spec'd
error type and the hint is no longer needed.
Added a new set of methods to test the cases.
Didn't try to solve the problem generally ("all usages except ... are
errors" means it easier, in theory, to make a ReportVoidExpressions
style visitor that catches absolutely all types) because most of the
work is actually about suppressing errors that are no longer needed.
Ie, from NO_SUCH_METHOD to USAGE_OF_VOID_RESULT which means we have to
put the void handling logic into each AST method specially anyway.
Some redundant tests removed.
Don't flag: ternaries, void -> void assignments, void returns in
dynamic.
Change-Id: Ief8035dcfe582b36b6372180ddcf4e453d320d9c
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/37441
Commit-Queue: Mike Fairhurst <mfairhurst@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Leaf Petersen <leafp@google.com>
We don't want to silently pass tests that think they are async when
the test framework doesn't know it's async.
Change-Id: I6556f8223d8d930ba252496adf233a5cb1108929
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/27923
Commit-Queue: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sigmund Cherem <sigmund@google.com>
This finishes going through the dev_compiler HTML tests and switches
out unittest for minitest wherever possible.
In the process, it gets another 10 tests strong mode clean, and gets
several more passing, and more not skipped. With this CL, we're running
another 50 more HTML tests (though some are expected to fail, mostly
because of #27578).
R=jacobr@google.com, vsm@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2419863002 .
Robert Nystrom