This adds a new request `dart/connectToDtd` that lets a client pass a DTD URI to the server. The server will connect to DTD and provide a subset of LSP methods (those that are currently available over LSP-Over-Legacy, minus the `connectToDtd` method itself) to DTD clients.
This works for both LSP and Legacy servers, and the shared tests run against both (where for legacy, the `dart/connectToDtd` request uses the LSP-over-Legacy support).
This is not currently behind a flag, however it won't do much on its own because no clients will make this request. Once we're happy the functioanlity is good we can either agree an SDK version number for IDEs to gate calling this method on, or we can expose a flag in server capabilities (and some equiv for legacy) so the client knows the functionality is available.
Change-Id: I911d37745a1b2685249dd88e4b152c3196ba627c
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/379303
Commit-Queue: Keerti Parthasarathy <keertip@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keerti Parthasarathy <keertip@google.com>
This change is just some refactoring and additional flags on handlers to reduce the size of a future CL that adds DTD support.
It:
- Slightly changes the meaning of `lspInitialized` in the server (to now mean the server is in the "initialized" state where it can handle the set of requests LSP allows after a server is initialized)
- Adds an additional future for `lspUninitialized` to track when the server moves _out_ of that state
- Removes an expando in LspOverLegacyHandler that tracked handlers against a server, because they're now available in the `lspInitialized` future (for DTD support, we need access to them without the LSP-over-Legacy handler, because we need to initialize DTD at startup regardless of whether a legacy client triggers LSP initialization)
- Adds a flag `requiresTrustedCaller` to handlers to indicate whether they can only be called by the native protocol clients. Tthis must be explicitly provided for shared handlers to ensure each choice is deliberate. The flag is unused in this CL but included here to reduce noise in the next (it touches many files)
- Changes the type of `toJson()` on generated enum clases to have the native type of the value that is returned
Change-Id: I0615cf4671b84887bf56c236d82d0fa3c26e6d87
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/379304
Commit-Queue: Keerti Parthasarathy <keertip@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keerti Parthasarathy <keertip@google.com>
ErrorOr is not related to (or used by) the spec or generated spec classes. It's a utility class for the server implementations of LSP handlers.
I'd like to extend this class and add some extensions (that require access to private fields) and don't feel it belongs in `package:language_server_protocol`.
(note: `package:language_server_protocol` is not published so I believe removing it from there is not a breaking change)
Change-Id: I06799b18d61d123364711a549231134c792e70e2
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/361140
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
This adds support for serving the contents of virtual files to the client over a custom LSP protocol (based on the VS Code API of the same name). This is currently a custom Dart protocol but hopefully very close to something that could become standard LSP in future.
If the client advertises support for this feature (currently with an experimental flag "supportsDartTextDocumentContentProviderEXP1") we will return the set of URI schemes we can provide content for (currently "dart-macro-file"). Additionally, we will map internal analyzer macro paths (like `/foo/bar.macro.dart`) onto that scheme (`dart-macro-file://foo/bar.dart`) instead of standard `file://` URIs.
Overlays are not created for these kinds of files (because they would override the server-generated content).
Some language functionality "just works" because we can get resolved ASTs for the macro files (and many LSP features operate on these), but more testing (and tests) are required.
Included are tests for the virtual file methods (and events) and Go-to-Definition. Tests for other features are outstanding.
Change-Id: I2056699652873a12b730f565b823f187f883a1ee
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/345420
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
This should have been a small change to keep us in-sync with small changes so when there are bigger changes (LSP 3.18.0) the change is less noisy.
However, it turns out the meta model is built from the latest version always, so it includes 3.18.0 proposed features.
So this change not only regenerates the code with the latest spec, it also adds some handling to exclude any types (and methods) marked as proposed.
It also includes a few minor fixes to things like re-wrapping of comments where there are references.
So, it should still essentially be a non-functional change, but the CL isn't as small as planned because of the cleanup.
- The lsp_meta_model.json file is downloaded and not changes I've made
- The protocol_generated.dart file is the output of the code-gen
- All other files are changes I made manually
Change-Id: I6380f86848d2799cf94d58a419ace0bf0d5a35ef
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/340040
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Quitslund <pquitslund@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Devon Carew