There are far too many files here to review everyone carefully.
Spot checking most of the diffs look good as test code is generally written
with less care than application code so lots of ugly formatting get through.
If people notice files where the automated formatting bothers them feel free
to comment indicating file names and I'll move spaces within comments to make
the formatting cleaner and use comments to force block formatting as I have
done for other case where formatting looked bad.
BUG=
R=efortuna@google.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2771453003 .
The recompilation infrastructure would set the propagated type of
operations just before code generation (skipping type propagation and
check insertion). This fixes that by splitting the recompilation
handling into two parts. One that is used only to register
recompilation candidates and one that is used to propagate the field
types for recompilation candidates. The one that propagates types is
only used when directly followed by type-propagation and check
insertion.
Remove the graph.highTypeLikelyhood flag which forced the use of
speculative type assumptions for everything if there was a field with
a likely type. That seems too aggressive to me.
R=floitsch@google.com
BUG=
TEST=language/field_optimization3_test.dart
Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com//10702167
git-svn-id: https://dart.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge/dart@9591 260f80e4-7a28-3924-810f-c04153c831b5
Jacob Richman