Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leaf Petersen b101a7d002 Add language versions to _2 test libraries
Change-Id: Ib33169c3e0ffc870915c189404074a1dea472546
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/196548
Reviewed-by: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Leaf Petersen <leafp@google.com>
2021-04-26 17:58:57 +00:00
James Lin 10e8d5d1a6 Try to clarify the RangeError.range message
The old RangeError.range message was confusing:

  RangeError (index): Invalid value: Not in range 0..2, inclusive: 9

The comma makes the message hard to parse.  I've seen a number of
people misinterpret "inclusive" as describing the invalid value (9)
instead of acting as a modifier on the range.

https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/29586 has a lot of
bikeshedding about this, but in the interest of mitigating confusion
sooner, I propose changing it to:

  RangeError (index): Invalid value: Not in inclusive range 0..2: 9

I'm intentionally trying to improve the message with minimal
disruption to the structure of the error message.  Although I'd much
prefer that "Invalid value" and the actual value be adjacent instead
of being interrupted by the explanation, such restructuring is rather
non-trivial.  RangeError allows the "Invalid value" message to be
customized, and rearranging terms could produce even worse
constructions.

I also considered:

  RangeError (index): Invalid value: Not in range [0, 2]: 9

And while I like that that is brief and clear, I chose not to use it
for people who are unfamiliar with interval notation and who might
mistake it as a Dart List.

Bug: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/29586
Change-Id: I0f23b195437e4053ae5f76b5d303123979a8c9fe
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/146024
Commit-Queue: Lasse R.H. Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lasse R.H. Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
2020-05-27 14:59:39 +00:00
Lasse R.H. Nielsen 8ab3dcf709 Make ArgumentError.check* functions return the valid argument.
This makes these checks useful in situations where you don't want to spend
an extra statement, like `=>` bodies or initializer lists (including
forwarding generative constructors).

Change-Id: Ia55b8741a7c75af631db48ac70e64597d8f96c73
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/135649
Commit-Queue: Lasse R.H. Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lasse R.H. Nielsen <lrn@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
2020-03-23 18:00:09 +00:00
Janice Collins e6b3fb5b05 Migrate test block 10 to Dart 2.0.
Special bits in this block:

int_parse_radix_test: Converted to a check only on TypeError (since this is raised at runtime based on user data)
iterable_element_at_test.dart: Split into multitest with compile errors.
iterable_fold_test.dart: add4 and a couple of other cases here cause problems for some compilers, split out into multitests and annotated in
status file.

BUG=
R=bkonyi@google.com

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2997533002 .
2017-08-09 08:47:48 -07:00