A field/function annotated with this pragma must be guaranteed to not
return `null` at runtime.
Make use of this non-nullable annotation in the VM's type propagator.
Annotates the "_TypedListView._typedData" field to ensure the VM knows it
returns a non-nullable _TypedListView.
Furthermore annotates methods on the integer implementation. Those particular
methods are recognized methods with a "dynamic" return type. This caused
the type propagator to use CompileType::Dynamic() as result type. Since a
previous CL started to only utilize the annotated type if it is better than
"dynamic" more integer operations got handled in-line, though with null-checks.
Annotating those methods to return non-null improves the in-line handling of
integer operations.
This improves dart-aot
On arm7hf:
SHA256: +5%, SHA: +6%, JsonObjectRoundTrip: +7%, ...
On arm8:
SHA1: +28%, MD5: +25%, SHA256: +15%, TypedData.Int16ListViewBench: +18.5%, StringInterpolation: +18%, ...
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31954
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/35154
Change-Id: Ia4263a37241a36c9dc35e8a48893297effa6f4b2
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/84421
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Currently the @pramga('vm:exact-result-type') annotation only works if
the function is a recognized method. This change changes that to make
the VM just look if a function has the annotation (no matter if it's
also in the list of recognized methods or not).
Furthermore this CL lets the type propgagator use
@pragma('vm:exact-result-type') annotations to narrow the [CompileType]
set on [LoadFieldInstr]s.
Since the @pragma is a general feature, this CL moves the
`Function::FindPragma()` to `Library::FindPragma` (which is where any
other metadata lookup happens). We also let the `FindPragma` accept any
of Class/Function/Field objects.
Furthermore the `FindPragma()` function is fixed to handle the case
when the evaluation of the metadata results in an error.
In this case we simply claim to not have found a pragma annotation.
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31954
Change-Id: If03f566e334cd53549985823ee3dd6b5e9672969
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/85163
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
This reverts commit 2de63ac01c.
Reason for revert: This triggers shutdown deadlocks for some reason:
#0 0xf7782cd9 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 0xf7753d0b pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2
#2 0x0108a515 dart::Monitor::WaitMicros(long long)
#3 0x0108a467 dart::Monitor::Wait(long long)
#4 0x00fe9048 dart::KernelIsolate::Shutdown()
#5 0x00f99ae4 dart::Dart::Cleanup()
#6 0x01278fce Dart_Cleanup
#7 0x00dd347e dart::bin::main(int, char**)
#8 0x00dd3d64 main
#9 0xf745caf3 __libc_start_main
#10 0x00dd2021 _start
TID 30443:
#0 0xf7782cd9 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 0xf7531ee6 epoll_wait
#2 0x00ddab61 dart::bin::EventHandlerImplementation::Poll(unsigned int)
#3 0x00dfb2d4 dart::bin::ThreadStart(void*)
#4 0xf774ff72 start_thread
#5 0xf753143e __clone
TID 30444:
#0 0xf7782cd9 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 0xf7753d0b pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2
#2 0x0108a515 dart::Monitor::WaitMicros(long long)
#3 0x0108a467 dart::Monitor::Wait(long long)
#4 0x012484d8 dart::BackgroundCompiler::Run()
#5 0x01248a37 dart::BackgroundCompilerTask::Run()
#6 0x0112203a dart::ThreadPool::Worker::Loop()
#7 0x01121efe dart::ThreadPool::Worker::Main(unsigned int)
#8 0x01089e73 dart::ThreadStart(void*)
#9 0xf774ff72 start_thread
#10 0xf753143e __clone
Original change's description:
> [VM] Add @pragma annotations on Field, make @pragma annotations work generally
>
> Currently the @pramga('vm:exact-result-type') annotation only works if
> the function is a recognized method. This change changes that to make
> the VM just look if a function has the annotation (no matter if it's
> also in the list of recognized methods or not).
>
> Furthermore this CL adds a "has_pragma" bit to [Field] objects, similar
> to how we have it on [Function]/[Class]es. This allows annotating
> fields with types, as we do with function return types.
>
> Furthermore this CL lets the type propgagator use
> @pragma('vm:exact-result-type') annotations to narrow the [CompileType]
> set on [LoadFieldInstr]s.
>
> Since the @pragma is a general feature, this CL moves the
> `Function::FindPragma()` to `Library::FindPragma` (which is where any
> other metadata lookup happens). We also let the `FindPragma` accept any
> of Class/Function/Field objects.
>
> Furthermore this CL adds a bailout if we try to evaluate metadata in
> the background compiler, since the background compiler is not allowed
> to execute generated code. The bailout should trigger a re-compilation
> on the mutator thread.
>
> Furthermore the `FindPragma()` function is fixed to handle the case
> when the evaluation of the metadata results in e.g. a language error.
> In this case we simply claim to not have found a pragma annotation.
>
> Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31954
>
> Change-Id: I0900a80d5ae0f3e8d09baf13cba1b20dd974df31
> Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/84037
> Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
TBR=vegorov@google.com,kustermann@google.com,alexmarkov@google.com,sjindel@google.com
Change-Id: Ic0d22d32b0eea3a76ec245cabab0006f97ca1b05
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/84622
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Currently the @pramga('vm:exact-result-type') annotation only works if
the function is a recognized method. This change changes that to make
the VM just look if a function has the annotation (no matter if it's
also in the list of recognized methods or not).
Furthermore this CL adds a "has_pragma" bit to [Field] objects, similar
to how we have it on [Function]/[Class]es. This allows annotating
fields with types, as we do with function return types.
Furthermore this CL lets the type propgagator use
@pragma('vm:exact-result-type') annotations to narrow the [CompileType]
set on [LoadFieldInstr]s.
Since the @pragma is a general feature, this CL moves the
`Function::FindPragma()` to `Library::FindPragma` (which is where any
other metadata lookup happens). We also let the `FindPragma` accept any
of Class/Function/Field objects.
Furthermore this CL adds a bailout if we try to evaluate metadata in
the background compiler, since the background compiler is not allowed
to execute generated code. The bailout should trigger a re-compilation
on the mutator thread.
Furthermore the `FindPragma()` function is fixed to handle the case
when the evaluation of the metadata results in e.g. a language error.
In this case we simply claim to not have found a pragma annotation.
Issue https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/31954
Change-Id: I0900a80d5ae0f3e8d09baf13cba1b20dd974df31
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/84037
Commit-Queue: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Previously we tried to rely on the assumption that all variables would be
boxed - so the machinery for setting correct catch-entry state only
supported tagged values and constants. However this both leads to worse code
and is not entirely correct assumption.
This also:
- renames various confusingly named classes: we move away from talking
about "catch entry state" to "catch entry moves" - because we only
record a subset of moves that needs to be performed and that does
not describe the whole state;
- refactors a bunch of associated code to be more readable and maintainable;
- adds documentation about catch implementation in optimized code
to runtime/docs/compiler;
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/21685.
Change-Id: I03ae361a1bb7710acbd9f661ae014e663a163c59
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/74860
Commit-Queue: Vyacheslav Egorov <vegorov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kustermann <kustermann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Markov <alexmarkov@google.com>
Martin Kustermann