Work towards https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/61868
This adds a new notification type, 'PluginPrint'. There are several
fields and variables then named 'pluginPrint' or 'print', and I am
definitely open to changing these names, but this is the best one that
I thought of.
PluginPrint has three fields: The name of the plugin that printed, the
message that was printed, and the timestamp.
We wrap each plugin's AnalysisRule invocations with a zone, so that
the `print` handler can know the name of the plugin. The prints are
caught and sent to the server isolate as Notifications. The
PluginIsolate then stores the collected prints. The Plugins Insights
page can then retrieve them and display them.
Manual testing, with 1000 libraries that get new lint reported once per
file, I did not observe a negative performance impact.
Change-Id: Id800ae41781c15ce89d06b563878c2b0edae43d3
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/486827
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
We previously just showed "<unnamed extension>" for extensions without names, but in some files I noticed we have a lot of these, and the outline/symbols list looks awful (just "<unnamed extension>" repeated many times).
This changes it to instead show "extension on FooClass" instead (if there is a valid type name). I added a new field to the protocol to support this because the LSP classes convert from those classes (something we've discussed changing, but might be easier later).
Screenshots of before/after are in https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/5818
Fixes https://github.com/Dart-Code/Dart-Code/issues/5818
Change-Id: I3885a722443291bfa2419514841469c862b74450
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/464560
Reviewed-by: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This renames the old screen, "Legacy plugins" and adds a new screen,
"Plugins". On the new plugins screen, we ask the plugins isolate(s) for
their plugins details, and print the following, for eadh plugin:
* the plugin's name
* the names of the registered lint rules
* the names of the registered warning rules
* the IDs and "messages" of the registered assists
* the IDs and "messages" and associated diagnostic codes of the
registered quick fixes
More to come in follow ups:
* The resolved versions of plugin packages (coming from package_config.json)
Change-Id: Ic3dc4c5bffa64fd4da4097c042a847cc064e41ce
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/447763
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This adds an optional version number to AddContentOverlay and UpdateContentOverlay in the legacy protocol.
It also moves some code (such as the `Map` that stores the current document versions) from the LSP server into the base class, and updates the overlay handlers to update it.
And finally, it removes the FailingTest() annotations on the versioned EditArguments test since they now work.
Change-Id: Icf2a2825eb6227f5faa3e21ae6c3a7d15997ef5a
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/404821
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This adds a new field to the existing (legacy) setClientCapabilities parameters that accepts an LSP ClientCapabilities.
This will allow a legacy client to indicate that it supports things like the `workspace/applyEdit` reverse-request.
Change-Id: Ia3b75c701f1699c92f902e058daec4844ce664fa
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/404106
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Quitslund <pquitslund@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Phil Quitslund <pquitslund@google.com>
We take any `<tt>`-wrapped text, and keep it in some "monospaced" /
"teletype" format. For dartdoc we put it in backticks. For Javadoc
we put it in `<code></code>`, which looks standard for inline text.
This corrects some erroneous doc comment reference-looking text
(`offsets[i]`) which is not meant to be a doc comment.
Change-Id: I1d77a02368e3cde158ce95d3b0095ba09e071370
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/401340
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Previously, we only had descriptions of changes on a SourceChange. In order to support annotated edits over LSP for "Fix All in Workspace" we need to be able to track descriptions on each change within a file so that if we're fixing multiple different lints with a single SourceFileEdit they can be annotated/grouped in the UI.
In order to avoid every fix providing a description, ChangeBuilder has a field that allows recording the current change description and all builders created from it will use that description when creating their changes. This allows the BulkFixProcessor to set the description on behalf of each fix producer ensuring they all get descriptions (which is done in a follow-up CL along with Fix All in Workspace functionality).
Change-Id: Ie1c508056898bd4000a5505cf59a1e6d35d28da0
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/356160
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Rawlins <srawlins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This adds support for the legacy server to switch to URIs using a client capability. In this mode, all "FilePaths" will be URI strings over the protocol (in both directions).
It also allows the server to send LSP notifications (wrapped inside an "lsp.notification" notification, matching how requests/responses work). Notifications are automatically enabled if the client uses any LSP methods or sends the new "supportsUris" capability.
Change-Id: I5d2b76e396862129c61de70d57397603c958a02d
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/349120
Reviewed-by: Jaime Wren <jwren@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This does not remove the computation of available declarations. This CL
seemed big enough without that, so I (or someone else) can get that in
the next CL.
Change-Id: I67ab49b75c8a415ccfaef16c4e49a00026a6091f
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/341160
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Originally we didn't use the LSP Request/Response classes, and just exposed the handlers through the legacy request/response.
However there were some mismatches (such as legacy protocol always returns Map<String, Object?> but some LSP requests return Lists, LSP using int|String IDs, and LSP having numeric error codes that don't match legacy string error codes).
This change uses LSP's request and Response by wrapping them inside a standard (legacy) handler. The LSP-over-Legacy handler has become a standard handler, and the params contain an "lspMessage" field that holds an LSP message, and the result contains an "lspResponse" field that contains an LSP response.
If an LSP handler returns an error, it will be returned as an error inside the LSP response, which will be in a _successful_ legacy request (since that's how we can return an LSP response - as the result).
Change-Id: I67973590ab32f3543d1a6e1b7279974e5e8832bc
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/315201
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
I don't think that there are any other highlight kinds we're going to
want to add, but if you can think of any please let me know.
I'll add code to actually associate the kind with record literals in the
next CL.
Change-Id: I15922984d96c2d0c7d97ea3f3832a95a68172968
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/256524
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
This is marked as experimental, and is only intended to be used by
`dart fix` as a way of formatting the files that were modified if the
analysis options file indicates that they ought to be formatted.
Change-Id: I288baebfc7cb3f82cc361bdc19835e43064eb0d0
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/238921
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
The intended use is in benchmarking, to specify a long timeout, so that
the first time, when we warm up, we do necessary one time work,
which would usually run out of budget the first few times. So, the
requests that we do measure are more stable.
Change-Id: I22e870b84dcd6f2ac201c5ec57081c39c6529ea1
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/220129
Commit-Queue: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
It looks that it is not used. We have a way to turn it on in
DartAnalysisServerService.java in Dart plugin for IntelliJ, but
setServerLogSubscription is not used in the plugin, marked as to be
used in the Flutter plugin, but actually is not used there.
Change-Id: If851044385100543ec0ff30e02dee3d99f1558e4
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/219362
Reviewed-by: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
In https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/191862 we added two new
required fields to `Location`. Unfortunately this was a breaking change
because plugins using an older version of the `analyzer_plugin` produce
location objects without those fields, leading to deserialization failures.
This CL makes those fields optional in order to fix the deserialization
issue.
Unfortunately, the `analyzer_plugin` package was published after the
required fields were added. Making them optional is a breaking change
because the constructor parameters go from being positional to being
named parameters.
We also neglected to update the version number of the protocol as part
of the previous CL. Technically this is also a breaking change for clients
of the analysis server, but given that they had no way to test to see
whether these fields existed they would need to have been written as if
the fields were optional in order to reference them at all, so I think
that from a practical standpoint it isn't a breaking change. That does,
however, raise the question of whether we should increment the version
numbers as part of this CL.
Change-Id: I35fc1f8e950669a3d8dd33cee6b81890261b5c47
Reviewed-on: https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/206942
Reviewed-by: Danny Tuppeny <danny@tuppeny.com>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Shcheglov <scheglov@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Wilkerson <brianwilkerson@google.com>
Sam Rawlins