Add ifdef to bit definitions to avoid conflicts with other libraries. Refactor BITx to use BIT macro. (#45)

This commit is contained in:
Steve Karg
2020-02-18 08:21:54 -06:00
committed by GitHub
parent cf963a63ca
commit 9c41180145
19 changed files with 89 additions and 104 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static bool dlmstp_compare_data_expecting_reply(
}
request.invoke_id = request_pdu[offset + 2];
/* segmented message? */
if (request_pdu[offset] & BIT3) {
if (request_pdu[offset] & BIT(3)) {
request.service_choice = request_pdu[offset + 5];
} else {
request.service_choice = request_pdu[offset + 3];
@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static bool dlmstp_compare_data_expecting_reply(
case PDU_TYPE_COMPLEX_ACK:
reply.invoke_id = reply_pdu[offset + 1];
/* segmented message? */
if (reply_pdu[offset] & BIT3) {
if (reply_pdu[offset] & BIT(3)) {
reply.service_choice = reply_pdu[offset + 4];
} else {
reply.service_choice = reply_pdu[offset + 2];
+2 -2
View File
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ bool dlmstp_compare_data_expecting_reply(
}
request.invoke_id = request_pdu[offset + 2];
/* segmented message? */
if (request_pdu[offset] & BIT3) {
if (request_pdu[offset] & BIT(3)) {
request.service_choice = request_pdu[offset + 5];
} else {
request.service_choice = request_pdu[offset + 3];
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ bool dlmstp_compare_data_expecting_reply(
case PDU_TYPE_COMPLEX_ACK:
reply.invoke_id = reply_pdu[offset + 1];
/* segmented message? */
if (reply_pdu[offset] & BIT3) {
if (reply_pdu[offset] & BIT(3)) {
reply.service_choice = reply_pdu[offset + 4];
} else {
reply.service_choice = reply_pdu[offset + 2];